‹ WorkflowsOpen operator view ↗
Review proposed changes to our union contracts before each negotiation round.
Gated · contract-review
Iteration 0
gate-blocked-no-improvement · val_score 0.9091 · 1/12 failed · 2h ago
Failed · 1
Passed · 11
CasePredictedExpectedFoldTrace
alt-seed-clean-clauseA 4-month non-compete clause with low severity is a standard, commonly-enforceable restriction in employment contracts and does not appear problematic.falsefalsetraincd0d952c ›alt-seed-clean-clause-step1Termination clauses with standard notice periods (30 days) are routine and low-risk; the preceding non-compete clause was marked false despite being potentially restrictive, suggesting the workflow accepts standard employment terms as non-problematic.falsefalsetrain689efb82 ›alt-seed-problematic-clause-step6Step 6 has identical clause type and text to step 2, which was labeled problematic; IP assignment including pre-existing assets is a high-severity and legally contentious clause pattern.truetruetest5c482ea9 ›clean-clause-step-0A standard 60-day mutual termination clause is a routine, non-problematic provision in union contracts that balances both parties' interests fairly.falsefalsetrain8b57644d ›clean-clause-step-1Pre-existing IP carve-outs are standard, uncontroversial contract language that typically do not pose legal risk in union contracts.falsefalsetraind1926ff3 ›clean-clause-step-2The clause text is identical to step 1 ("Pre-existing IP carved out"), same clause type, and step 1 was marked non-problematic with low severity, suggesting consistent classification patterns across similar clauses.falsefalsetestf97d8eac ›grievance-precedent-flaggedThe clause grants either party termination with only 14 days notice, which is substantially shorter than the 60-day notice standard seen in step 0 and creates operational risk for union contracts requiring adequate planning periods.truetruetraina975b31c ›notification-window-30-day-breachIP assignment clauses that claim ownership of pre-existing IP are high-risk and typically problematic under most jurisdictions' employment law, making this severity-high clause likely to be flagged as problematic.truetruetrain34ca8a4b ›overtime-carveout-flaggedThe clause assigns all IP including pre-existing assets to the company, which is a high-severity risk that contradicts standard IP carve-out practices seen in previous low-risk contracts.truetruetrain750f3910 ›seed-7-clean-clause-step0The termination clause uses standard, clear language with symmetric rights (either party, equal notice) and low severity flag, indicating no legal problems detected.falsefalsetraind9ca7d8f ›seed-7-problematic-step1High severity combined with a specific severance dollar amount lacking context on whether it aligns with union contract standards suggests a problematic clause warranting closer review.truetruetraine6257d4d ›